Court of Appeals and Censorship

Dear Friends,

It seems that the Obama Administration continues to behave like the Bush Administration when it comes to enemy combatants and the arguement that they can detain whomever they please.  The headline for an article in The New York Times today (here) was "Appeals Court Sides with Detainee". 

A federal appeals court has sided with a Guantánamo prisoner whose case prompted a major internal argument among Obama administration legal advisers last year over how broadly to define terrorism suspects who may be detained without trial. Belkacem Bensayah, an Algerian who was arrested in Bosnia in 2001 and accused of helping people who wanted to travel to Afghanistan and join Al Qaeda, cannot be considered part of the terrorist organization based on the evidence the government presented against him, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has ruled.
“The government presented no direct evidence of actual communication between Bensayah and any Al Qaeda member, much less evidence suggesting Bensayah communicated with” anyone else to facilitate travel by an Al Qaeda member, Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg wrote in a 17-page opinion that was declassified late last week. Parts of the ruling were censored by the government.
Mark Fleming, a partner at the law firm Wilmer Hale who is representing Mr. Bensayah, praised the ruling and called on the Obama administration to send his client back to Bosnia, where his wife and daughters live.

Why must the Obama Administration continue to ignore the rule of law and our Constitution and continue the failed legal theories of the Bush Administration?

Thanks for reading and please comment,
The Unabashed Liberal