Wednesday, June 9, 2010

BP knew it was being negligent and unsafe

Dear Friends,

Today on Democracy Now, Amy Goodman interviewed Abrahm Lustgarten, an investigative reporter at ProPublica.  Mr. Lustgarten paints an almost unbelievable picture of corporate greed and executive arrogance that certainly laid the foundation for the many accidents that BP has had over the years including the blow out of the Deep Horizon well in the Gulf of Mexico.  Here is the summary of the interview from the Democracy Now website followed by the entire interview.
The investigative news organization ProPublica is reporting a series of internal BP investigations over the past decade warned senior BP managers that the oil company repeatedly disregarded safety and environmental rules and risked a serious accident if it did not change its ways. The reports described instances in which management flouted safety by neglecting aging equipment, pressured employees not to report problems, and cut short or delayed inspections to reduce production costs. A 2001 internal report noted that BP had neglected key equipment needed for an emergency shutdown, including safety shutoff valves and gas and fire detectors similar to those that could have helped prevent the fire and explosion on the Deepwater Horizon rig in the Gulf. We speak to Abrahm Lustgarten, an investigative reporter at ProPublica.

Thanks for reading and please comment,
The Unabashed Liberal

Jon Stewart, President Obama and Its Complicated

Dear Friends,

Last night on The Daily Show Jon Stewart did an incredibly direct segment that brought clearly into focus for me one of President Obama's weaknesses.  The issues that President Obama is facing are really big and important and the solutions are not necessarily things that he can just implement by himself.  There are, however, solutions for all the issues that we face.  It is the politics makes implementing those solutions difficult and complicated not the solutions themselves.  As Jon Stewart makes clear, President Obama claims that everything is complicated, but it is really only the politics that are complicated.  President Obama needs to propose the uncomplicated straight forward common sense solutions that are based on logic, science and historical precedent and then take those solutions to the American people so that Congress has no choice but to act.

Anyway,  you will enjoy the following segment from The Daily Show.  The best part starts at minute 6:05.



The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Ass Quest 2010
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full EpisodesPolitical HumorTea Party

Thanks for reading and please comment,
The Unabashed Liberal


Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Why Americans distrust their government, part 7

Dear Friends,

This morning NBC aired an interview of President Obama by Matt Lauer (here).  In that interview, President Obama indicated that it was possible that a marsh that is hit by the oil will suffer of a year or maybe two but will recover completely.  There is no precedent that would indicate that an oil soaked marsh could recover in two years.  It may not even be there in two years.  It may have eroded away.  Remember my post from June 5th about the lingering effects of the Exxon Valdez spill that have lasted over 20 years.  Also remember that we now know that as little as 1 part per billion of oil can have an negative impact on fish eggs which impacts the entire food chain.

Probably worse than President Obama's misleading optimism about a quick recovery, is the ongoing reference by BP and our government about the amount of boom that has been deployed to stop the oil.  Even if the booms are properly deployed and tended which they are not, they will only stop and/or permit the recovery of a very small portion of the oil that has spilled.  That does not mean that we should not try.  But the worst part is that the booms are not being properly deployed or tended.  BP and our government are trying to make us feel that something is being done.  President Obama said that he does not need to meet with the CEO of BP because he would say all the right things, but President Obama is more interested in BP's actions.  Well, I do not need to meet with President Obama because he would say all the right things, but I am more interested in the results that are being obtained than a constant count of the feet of booms being deployed.

Here is a clip from tonight's The Rachel Maddow Show which includes President Obama's optimistic remarks about the marshes as well as a discussion about the lack of boom tending and the potential harm being done by some booms that are now trapping the oil on islands rather than keeping it off them.



Americans can handle the truth, and Americans are entitled to the truth from their President and their government even if it is unpleasant. Why aren't they getting it?

Thanks for reading and please comment,
The Unabashed Liberal


Sunday, June 6, 2010

Why Americans distrust their government, part 6

Dear Friends,

Last week there was some more confusion from President Obama, his Department of the Interior and its Minerals Management Service.  Here are a couple of paragraphs from David Dayen at firedoglake.com
You really have to parse Barack Obama closely to get the full measure of his words. Here’s what he said last week at his press conference about additional actions on offshore drilling:
Additionally, after reading the report’s recommendations with Secretary Salazar and other members of my administration, we’re going to be ordering the following actions: First, we will suspend the planned exploration of two locations off the coast of Alaska. Second, we will cancel the pending lease sale in the Gulf of Mexico and the proposed lease sale off the coast of Virginia. Third, we will continue the existing moratorium and suspend the issuance of new permits to drill new deepwater wells for six months. And four, we will suspend action on 33 deepwater exploratory wells currently being drilled in the Gulf of Mexico.
All of the actions concerned deepwater wells; there was nothing about wells in more shallow water. And so today, regulators approved a new well in the Gulf of Mexico, ending a ban on shallow-water offshore drilling.
The Minerals Management Service granted a new drilling permit sought by Bandon Oil and Gas for a site about 50 miles off the coast of Louisiana and 115 feet below the ocean’s surface. It’s south of Rockefeller State Wildlife Refuge and Game Preserve, far to the west of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig that triggered the BP spill.
Obama last week extended a moratorium on wells in deep water like the BP one that blew out a mile below the surface in April and is gushing millions of gallons of oil. But at the same time, the president quietly allowed a three-week-old ban on drilling in shallow water to expire.
“I’m outraged,” said Kieran Suckling, executive director for the Tucson, Ariz.,-based Center for Biological Diversity, after a reporter told him of the new permit. “How is it that shallow water drilling suddenly became safe again?”
The last sentence asks the appropriate question.  As far as I can tell there is no evidence to support the proposition that shallow water drilling is any safer or less likely to cause huge spills than deep water drilling.  Here are a couple of paragraphs from a 2008 article in the Houston Chronicle.
When a Union Oil Co. well six miles off the California coast blew out in January 1969, an estimated 80,000 barrels of crude spewed into the Santa Barbara Channel — fouling beaches and marring the offshore industry's reputation.With the nation now debating whether to open more areas offshore to oil and gas drilling, the oil industry can rightly claim it has avoided a repeat of that catastrophe, even as offshore activity has ballooned.
But offshore operators continue to spill thousands of barrels of oil, fuel and chemicals into federal waters each year, government records show.
Offshore operators have had 40 spills greater than 1,000 barrels since 1964, including 13 in the last 10 years, according to data from the U.S. Minerals Management Service, which oversees exploration and production in federal waters.
More than one spill per year in US waters from 1998 to 2008.  So there are spills all the time.  They just aren't of the magnitude of BP's Deep Horizon well.  There have been two really big spills in my adult life that are instructive as to whether shallower is safer or easier to stop than deeper. 

Chronologically first, is the blowout of the Ixtoe 1 well in the Mexican waters of the Gulf of Mexico in 1979.  The well blewout in June 1979 and the spill was finally stopped in March 1980, ten months and well over 100 million gallons of crude oil later.  That well was in 160 feet of water, not the 5,000 feet that the Deep Horizon well is in. 

The second is the blowout of the Montara oil well off Australia in the Timor Sea in 2009.  It blewout in August and the spewing of oil was finally stopped in November after somewhere between 1.2 million and 9.0 million gallons of crude oil had escaped into the Timor Sea.  That well was drilled in 260 feet of water, not the 5,000 feet that the Deep Horizon well is in.

So the two other largest blowouts on record were from shallow wells that for some reason President Obama thinks are safer.  Why does he continue to listen to big oil experts instead of relying on his own intelligence and common sense?  Why would we trust a government that tells us that shallow wells are ok even if deep wells are not?  Why would we trust a government that is working harder at finding a way to keep drilling than it is at telling us the truth?

Thanks for reading and please comment,
The Unabashed Liberal