I have been troubled for a long time about the relationship between the United States and Saudi Arabia. Despite the reality of their human rights abuses and support of terrorists and terrorism, the United States maintains a very close relationship with Saudi Arabia and portrays the Saudi government as moderate. The official policy of the United States government towards Saudi Arabia for decades seems to be that the Saudis can do whatever they want as long as they keep selling us oil.
Human Rights Watch's 2015 World Report on Saudi Arabia (here) starts with this summary paragraph.
Saudi Arabia continued in 2014 to try, convict, and imprison political dissidents and human rights activists solely on account of their peaceful activities. Systematic discrimination against women and religious minorities continued. Authorities failed to enact systematic measures to protect the rights of 9 million foreign workers. As in past years, authorities subjected hundreds of people to unfair trials and arbitrary detention. New anti-terrorism regulations that took effect in 2014 can be used to criminalize almost any form of peaceful criticism of the authorities as terrorism.Most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi. Saudi royal family members were allowed to leave the United States during the no fly period after the attacks. If you have the time, there is a fascinating article in Vanity Fair entitled "Saving the Saudis" (here) that details the flight of the Saudis and the continued attempts by the United States government to deny that they happened. This paragraph summarizes my underlying concern.
The bin Laden family neatly exemplifies the dilemma the United States faces in its relations with Saudi Arabia. On the one hand, the bin Ladens are products of Wahhabi fundamentalism, a puritanical Islamic sect that has helped make Saudi Arabia a fertile breeding ground for terrorists. Contrary to popular belief, Osama was not the only member of the immense bin Laden family—there are more than 50 siblings—with ties to militant Islamic fundamentalists. As early as 1979, Mahrous bin Laden, an older half-brother of Osama’s, had befriended members of the militant Muslim Brotherhood and had played, perhaps unwittingly, a key role in the Mecca Affair, a violent uprising against the House of Saud in 1979 which resulted in more than 100 deaths.A Frontline report "analysis wahhabism" (here) starts with this paragraph.
For more than two centuries, Wahhabism has been Saudi Arabia's dominant faith. It is an austere form of Islam that insists on a literal interpretation of the Koran. Strict Wahhabis believe that all those who don't practice their form of Islam are heathens and enemies. Critics say that Wahhabism's rigidity has led it to misinterpret and distort Islam, pointing to extremists such as Osama bin Laden and the Taliban. Wahhabism's explosive growth began in the 1970s when Saudi charities started funding Wahhabi schools (madrassas) and mosques from Islamabad to Culver City, California.The funding of the madrassas is made possible by the United States oil consumption and the willingness of the United States government to ignore the Saudi human rights record and support for terrorists worldwide.
King Salman the new Saudi king is no reformer. While his predecessor King Abdullah was seen by some as a reformer, he made little progress and King Salman is seen as more closely tied to religious conservatives. My fears about the direction that Saudi Arabia is heading and the unholy alliance that the United States has with Saudi Arabia were confirmed and fueled by a recent article in The New York Times about Prince Mohammed bin Salman (here).
Prince Mohammed is 29 years old and the King's son with the King's third wife. King Salman is giving him huge amounts of power and control. The Prince seems to be a major force behind Saudi Arabia's war in Yemen. Prince Mohammed has been educated only in Saudi Arabia which I believe gives him a very limited view of the world and one that is tainted by Wahhabism. The following quote from The New York Times article gives me great concern about his world view.
Prince Mohammed seemed to be planning for a future in government from an early age, said one family associate who knew him well. Unlike many other Saudi princes of his generation, Prince Mohammed never smoked, drank alcohol or stayed out late. “It was obvious to me that he was planning his future — he was always very concerned about his image,” the family associate said.President Obama is, of course, following the well established United States government line in this quote from the same article.
After meeting with both princes at a summit meeting of gulf nations at Camp David last month, President Obama said the younger Prince Mohammed “struck us as extremely knowledgeable, very smart.”The last line of the article gave a much better assessment of the situation.
“I think wise beyond his years,” Mr. Obama added in an interview with the Saudi-owned Al Arabiya network.
Abu Fahad, a businessman sipping coffee in a luxury hotel, said, “He has become Mr. Knows Everything. But he is 29 years old — what does he know?”As long as we continue to support the Saudi regime because of our desire for its oil, the Saudis will continue to support Wahhabism which will produce young Saudis who are hateful and are taught that if one does not practice their form of Islam they must die. We are not only destroying the planet, we are creating terrorists in the process.
Thanks for reading and please comment,
The Unabashed Liberal
No comments:
Post a Comment