Monday, March 2, 2026

Trump's Unconstitutional and Illegal War of Choice against Iran

 Dear Friends,

President Trump has initiated and is prosecuting an illegal war against Iran with the direct complicity of some members of his cabinet, some members of Congress and some senior military officers.  The oaths of office of all these officials contain the following words in one form or another, “I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same”. 

The Constitution and subsequent Supreme Court interpretations make it clear that only Congress can declare war.  President Trump has not provided any evidence that Iran was about to attack the United States in any way.  So, he cannot use the theory of a preemptive strike to prevent an imminent attack on the United States as an excuse for his illegal action.  He has, however, referred to what he is doing in Iran as a “war”.  Congress has not authorized a war against Iran.  Congress has not approved the use of military force against Iran.  Congress has not even debated any form of armed conflict with Iran, much less a war of choice against Iran. 

 

Consequently, Trump’s war of choice against Iran is unconstitutional and illegal.  He has violated his oath of office, is violating the Constitution and is issuing illegal orders to the Secretary of Defense and senior military officers.  He needs to be impeached by the House of Representatives, tried by the Senate, found guilty and removed from office.

 

The President of the United States is not the only one that must face the consequences of his illegal actions.  The Secretary of Defense and some senior military officers are obeying Trump’s illegal orders and are issuing illegal orders to their subordinates to prosecute an illegal war.  They have violated their oaths of office, they have dishonored their offices, they have shown cowardice at a time when bravery is required.  The Secretary of Defense needs to be impeached and removed from office. The senior military officers who are participating in this illegal war need to be court martialed, if not by this Administration, then by the next one.

 

The members of Congress who are supporting Trump’s illegal war and who are mainly Republicans, are violating their oaths of office as well by not asserting the powers of Congress.  At I write this piece, it is not even clear that Congress will hold any votes on Trump’s illegal war of choice.  Members of Congress are willing to ignore their duty and let American service members die, be wounded and put their lives at risk, but they are too cowardly to even have a vote on the issue.  They all need to be voted out of office and publicly shamed for their dereliction of duty and immoral behavior.

 

The authors of the Constitution did not want one person, the President of the United States, to be able to start a war on his own.  The Constitution set up a process which would result in a debate on the merits of going to war.  Since that debate would take place in Congress, the American people would have a say in whether to take the monumental step of going into war.  

 

I don’t know if going to war was the best approach for American interests because there has been no debate – no facts disclosed, no goals, no strategies or tactics discussed, no risk assessments, no exit strategies, no plan b, etc.  All of which should have been thoroughly discussed before we started a war of choice.  The comments about the reasons and goals for this war of choice by President Trump, Secretary Hegseth, and General Caine have been inconsistent, constantly changing, without factual evidence and always ignoring the constitutional requirement that Congress, not the President make the decision.

 

President Trump wants to be a dictator.  There is no clearer indication that a leader is a dictator than when he assumes the right to take the country into a war of choice without following the Constitution.  We, the people, cannot let this decision stand.  Congress must act to restrain the President.


Thanks for reading and please comment,

The Unabashed Liberal

Wednesday, February 25, 2026

Villefranche-sur-mer - Winter 2026-6

Dear Friends,

Our time in Villefranche is rapidly coming to an end.  We are always sad when we must leave our French teacher, our friends and our home away from home.  This year is no different.  We had our last french lesson of this trip this morning.  We thought back on our time here this year and in the past.  We could never live here full time, but we still love to come here and hate to leave.  We are lucky that we can spend 3 months a year here.

After our last French lesson of the trip, we couldn't face making our own lunch so we went out to Bakaro, a small Italian bakery/coffee shop/cafe/wine bar that is just a three minute walk from our apartment.  If we go out for breakfast, it is our favorite spot.  They also have wonderful treats, great coffee and good lunches.  Today, Jane had an omelette.  They are really good especially with ham and cheese.  They are served with a little green salad.  I had their lasagna bolognaise.  Since we were sad that we would be leaving soon, we each had a glass of wine.  Jane had a wonderful little cookie with apricot filling and a noisette (small espresso with foamed milk).  I had a chocolat chaud.  Here is a picture of our dessert from lunch today.

noisette, chocolat chaud and cookie

Chocolat chaud is hot cocoa, but the Italian version and some French versions bear little to no relation to what we think of as hot cocoa.  I have written about chocolat chaud many times before.  Here is one example.  Since writing that blog, I discovered the Italian version of chocolat chaud in Ventimiglia.  It is a town located just into Italy from France and easy to get to on the train from Villefranche.  

The Italian chocolat chaud is much thicker than the french style.  The chocolat chaud at the Gran Caffe in Beaulieu-sur-mer which I had thought was the best was the Italian style but not so thick.  The chocolat chaud in Ventimiglia was great and very thick, but today I tried the chocolat chaud at Bakaro.  It is a whole new level of melted chocolat just barely able to be drunk.  

You can see from the photo below how thick the chocolat chaud is.  It is barely able to slip off the spoon.


Bakaro is so passionate about their chocolat chaud, they have a special sign describing the different styles.


Here is a very loose translation.  
Three ways to savor your chocolat chaud.
    • "The Lapping" (normal)
      • light, fluid, comforting 
    • "The Swell" (thick)  [as in a big wave]
      • more body, a texture that envelops your patate
    • "The Depths" dense, intensely rich,
      • to savor with a spoon
I asked the server for the thickest kind.  She actually told me after that she made me one between the "Swell" and the "Depths'.  Anyway, it was fantastic.  If it had been any thicker, I would have needed a knife.  I won't be able to go again this trip to Bakaro, but I will stop by in October to try the full on "Depths".

Thanks for reading and please comment,
The Unabashed Liberal

Monday, February 9, 2026

Villefranche-sur-mer - Winter 2026 - 5

 Dear Friends,

Last night we went to a concert by the Orchestra Philharmonique de Monte-Carlo.  It was performed in the Auditorium Rainier III.  The program was curated just for us.

    Johann Sebastian Bach, Suite pour orchestre n3 in ré majeur

    Joseph Haydn, Concerto pour violoncello en do majeur

    Ludwig van Beethoven, Symphonie n2 en ré majeur

First a little translation - in France they use do, ré, mi, fa, sol, la and si, instead of A, B, C, D, E, F and G. We would say the Bach Suite and the Beethoven symphony were in D major (not ré) and the Hayden concerto was in C major (not do).  Also a violoncello is the French word for a cello.

Ton Koopman was the conductor.  He is a well known conductor particularly of Baroque music.  The entire concert was great, particularly because we love Baroque music.  From our point of view unfortunately, it is very difficult to hear a symphony orchestra play an entire concert of Baroque music.  The orchestra played very well and the overall concert was great, but the real star of the night was the Hayden cello concerto in which the soloist was the principal cellist of the orchestra, Thierry Amadi.  Originally a special soloist was scheduled to play but had to cancel and was replaced by Thierry.  I think that audiences really enjoy hearing one of their own players as the soloist.  The potentially greater skill and musicality of an out of town soloist is not apparent to the most of the audience, and that potential greater skill level is more than offset by the thrill of hearing one of your own and the energy with which the local player rises to the occasion of being the star of the night.  We didn't even know Thierry, but we could hear and feel the music and the pride the audience took in his performance.  He was fantastic.

The venue, the Rainier III Auditorium, is a beautiful venue located right on the Mediterranean coast. 

Here we are in the lobby just before the performance.


Here is a photo of the interior before people have arrived.

The site lines are great as are the acoustics.  The people watching is also fantastic.  

Our entire experience was great.

Thank you for reading and please comment,

The Unabashed Liberal